On his first day back in office, former President Donald Trump signed an executive order to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO). This decision, met with widespread criticism from global health experts, raises concerns about America’s preparedness for future pandemics and the WHO’s ability to respond to emerging health threats.
Trump cited WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic and the financial burden on the US as justification for the withdrawal. However, experts argue this move could leave the US vulnerable to outbreaks like bird flu and Marburg virus, while hindering the WHO’s capacity to address global health crises.
The withdrawal impacts the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) by limiting its access to crucial data on emerging health threats worldwide. This information sharing is vital for early detection and response to potential outbreaks. Experts also warn that the US could face a resurgence of previously eradicated childhood diseases due to disruptions in vaccination programs. The looming threat of bird flu, H5N1, is particularly concerning, as the withdrawal could hinder the development and distribution of necessary vaccines.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(768×896:770×898)/World-Health-Organization-HQ-in-Geneva-012125-458219da86ac4662b7bab301f2febb91.jpg)
Beyond disease outbreaks, the US risks losing its global standing in health leadership. Withdrawing from the WHO diminishes America’s influence in international health negotiations and its ability to hold other nations accountable during epidemics. While Trump’s executive order vaguely mentions establishing new mechanisms for public health and biosecurity, no specific details were provided.
The financial implications for the WHO are significant. The US is the organization’s largest contributor, and its withdrawal translates to a substantial loss of funding for crucial programs, including vaccine initiatives and maternal and child health services. This loss could severely hamper the WHO’s ability to carry out its global health mission.
Trump defended his decision by accusing the WHO of mishandling the COVID-19 pandemic and demanding that China, based on its population size, should contribute more financially. He asserted that the US was being taken advantage of financially by the organization. However, the WHO’s funding structure is based on a country’s population and income, making the US contribution proportionate.
:max_bytes(150000):strip_icc():focal(1219×764:1221×766)/briefing-at-the-National-Health-Committee-in-Beijing-China-31-March-2021-012125-1ffff5f8830d409e99b99143f8cf75ba.jpg)
In its official statement, the WHO expressed regret over the US withdrawal, highlighting the long-standing partnership between the two entities and their joint achievements in eradicating smallpox and nearly eradicating polio. The organization emphasized its critical role in global health security, particularly in responding to emergencies in high-risk areas. The WHO remains hopeful that the US will reconsider its decision and re-engage in constructive dialogue to preserve their crucial partnership for the well-being of global populations.
