The recent unveiling of Princess Diana’s statue at Kensington Palace has sparked global interest and reignited discussions about her enduring legacy. While the event was intended to commemorate the princess’s life and philanthropy, it was also marked by the strained relationship between her sons, Prince William and Prince Harry.
Royal commentator Daisy McAndrew, who has covered the royal family for years, offered her insights on the event. According to McAndrew, Diana would have been pleased to see her sons come together for the occasion but saddened by the apparent rift between them.
“I think she would have loved the fact that her boys were there,” McAndrew shared. “I think she would have hated the fact that her boys seem to be still at loggerheads with each other.”
McAndrew believes that Diana, as a devoted mother, would have prioritized the bond between her sons above all else. She speculated that Diana would have intervened and prevented the situation from escalating to its current state.
Despite the underlying tensions, the statue’s design reflects a united front in honoring their mother’s passions. Diana was renowned for her extensive charitable work, supporting a multitude of causes during her lifetime. After her divorce, she narrowed her focus to a handful of organizations that resonated deeply with her values.
These included supporting sick children at Great Ormond Street Hospital, advocating for the homeless at Centrepoint, and championing the rights of those affected by leprosy and AIDS. Diana was particularly drawn to individuals and communities whose voices were often marginalized. She utilized her platform to amplify their stories and fight for their well-being.
The statue’s design encapsulates these essential aspects of Diana’s legacy. Both Prince William and Prince Harry were actively involved in the design process, ensuring their vision accurately represented their mother’s spirit.
Public reception to the statue has been largely positive, with many praising its poignant representation of Diana’s warmth and compassion. However, some art critics have expressed reservations, finding the piece lacking in artistic merit.
McAndrew acknowledged the mixed reactions from the art world, suggesting that some of the criticism stems from a preference for avant-garde or unconventional styles. She emphasized that the statue’s purpose is to resonate with the public, who have expressed their admiration for the heartfelt tribute.
The statue’s unveiling has inevitably drawn attention to the relationship between William and Harry. While their joint presence at the event offered a glimmer of hope for reconciliation, reports suggest their interactions were limited.
Royal spokespeople have remained tight-lipped about the extent of their communication, fueling speculation about the brothers’ current dynamic. The focus, however, remains on the statue as a testament to Diana’s enduring impact and a symbol of her enduring legacy.
