Robert Robertson, a 57-year-old Texas man, faces execution despite growing doubts about the “shaken baby syndrome” diagnosis used to convict him in 2003. The case highlights the controversial history of this diagnosis and its role in numerous wrongful convictions.
Shaken Baby Syndrome: A Discredited Diagnosis?
Robertson was found guilty of murdering his 2-year-old daughter, Nikki, who died after being rushed to the hospital unconscious. A pediatrician at the time pointed to signs of shaken baby syndrome (SBS), leading to Robertson’s conviction. However, the scientific validity of SBS has been widely discredited in recent years.
The diagnosis relies on a triad of symptoms: brain swelling, bleeding on the surface of the brain, and bleeding in the retinas. However, research has shown that these symptoms can also be caused by a range of other factors, including infections, birth trauma, and accidental injuries.
Mounting Evidence of Wrongful Conviction
Since Robertson’s conviction, courts across the US have exonerated at least 33 people convicted based on SBS diagnoses. New evidence in Robertson’s case suggests that Nikki may have died from complications related to pneumonia. Additionally, Robertson’s lawyers argue that his undiagnosed autism at the time led to misinterpretations of his behavior during police questioning. They contend that his lack of outward emotion was wrongly perceived as a lack of caring.
Calls for Clemency Grow Louder
Robertson’s case has garnered significant attention, with 86 Texas lawmakers from both sides of the aisle urging Governor Greg Abbott to grant clemency. Even the lead detective who investigated the case now advocates for Robertson’s release, stating, “He is an innocent man. I’ll [be] forever haunted by my participation in his prosecution.”
A Glimmer of Hope?
The Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles has the power to recommend clemency for Robertson. However, the ultimate decision rests with Governor Abbott, who has a history of rarely granting such requests.
As Robertson awaits his fate, his case serves as a stark reminder of the human cost of flawed scientific evidence and the urgent need for criminal justice reform.
