The high-profile attempted murder trial of former Olympian Michael Barisone has concluded with a verdict of not guilty by reason of insanity. Barisone, a member of the 2008 US Olympic equestrian team, was accused of shooting Lauren Kanarek, a dressage rider, and attempting to shoot her fiancé, Robert Goodwin, at his New Jersey farm in August 2019.
The jury found Barisone not guilty by reason of insanity on the charges related to the shooting of Kanarek, who survived the attack. He was acquitted of the charges related to Goodwin. Following the verdict, Judge Taylor ordered Barisone to undergo a 30-day psychiatric evaluation to determine if he poses a threat to himself or the community. This evaluation will inform the decision regarding his potential hospitalization or release under specific conditions. A closed hearing is scheduled for May 17th to discuss the evaluation’s findings.
The Incident and the Lead-Up to Trial
The shooting stemmed from a protracted landlord-tenant dispute between Barisone and Kanarek, who lived and trained at his equestrian facility. The relationship between Barisone and Kanarek had deteriorated significantly in the months leading up to the incident, with police responding to multiple calls related to the escalating tensions. On August 7, 2019, the conflict culminated in violence when Barisone allegedly shot Kanarek twice in the chest. Goodwin intervened and tackled Barisone, preventing him from allegedly shooting Goodwin as well. While Goodwin restrained Barisone, Kanarek called 9-1-1. According to reports, Barisone repeatedly stated, “I had a good life,” as he was taken into custody.
The Trial and the Defense’s Argument
The trial unfolded over several weeks, with the prosecution arguing that Barisone acted with intent. The defense, however, contended that Barisone was suffering from a mental breakdown at the time of the shooting and was not responsible for his actions. Expert testimony regarding Barisone’s mental state played a crucial role in the proceedings. The defense presented evidence suggesting that Barisone was experiencing a dissociative episode and was not in control of his behavior. This argument ultimately swayed the jury to find him not guilty by reason of insanity regarding the attack on Kanarek.
/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/cmg/W6N5K62HJFCMZJJD4JEQX4D6YE.jpg)
The Verdict and Its Implications
The verdict signifies that while the jury believed Barisone committed the act, they also accepted the defense’s argument that his mental state rendered him legally not responsible. The mandatory psychiatric evaluation will determine the next steps in Barisone’s case. The evaluation will assess his current mental health status and the potential risk he poses to himself and others. This assessment will guide the court in deciding whether he requires further treatment in a secure facility or can be released under certain conditions, such as mandatory therapy and monitoring.
A Complex Case with Lasting Impact
The Barisone case highlights the complexities of mental health within the legal system. It underscores the importance of expert testimony in determining culpability when mental illness is a factor. The case also brings to the forefront the challenges faced by athletes and the pressures of high-stakes competition. While Barisone’s Olympic career brought him acclaim, the events at his farm paint a tragic picture of a life derailed by internal struggles. The verdict brings a close to the legal proceedings, but the long-term implications for Barisone and the victims remain.
Looking Ahead
The May 17th hearing will offer more clarity on Barisone’s future. Until then, he will remain in the custody of mental health professionals. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly contribute to ongoing discussions about mental health awareness, especially within the demanding world of professional sports. It also serves as a stark reminder of the devastating consequences that can arise from unresolved conflicts.
