Robert De Niro’s former executive assistant, Graham Chase Robinson, delivered emotional testimony in a New York civil trial, alleging controlling and abusive behavior by the actor, including an insistence that she scratch his back, which she described as “creepy.” The lawsuit, which Robinson filed in 2019 after 11 years of employment with De Niro, seeks $12 million in damages for gender discrimination and retaliation. De Niro, in turn, is countersuing for $6 million, citing breach of loyalty and fiduciary duty. This high-profile case delves into the complex dynamics of a celebrity workplace and raises questions about power imbalances and appropriate professional conduct.
Actor Robert De Niro arrives at court in New York.Actor Robert De Niro arriving at court in New York City for the trial.
Robinson, 41, testified that the alleged mistreatment left her jobless, depressed, and suffering from anxiety. She described the profound impact on her mental and emotional well-being, stating, “I was having an emotional and mental breakdown. I wasn’t eating. I wasn’t sleeping. Couldn’t run. I was overwhelmed. I felt like I hit rock bottom.” She claimed to have applied for 638 jobs without success, attributing her unemployment to the trauma she experienced while working for De Niro.
The Back-Scratching Incident and De Niro’s Response
A key point of contention in the trial revolves around Robinson’s claim that De Niro repeatedly asked her to scratch his back. She testified that the requests, which she found uncomfortable and “disgusting,” continued for years until she suggested he use a back-scratching device. De Niro allegedly responded, “I like the way that you do it.” Robinson characterized this comment as “creepy” and inappropriate. De Niro, during his own testimony earlier in the week, dismissed the back-scratching allegations and other claims, asserting that he always treated Robinson with respect.
Robert De Niro testifies in Manhattan federal court.Robert De Niro testifying during the trial.
Conflicting Accounts and Emotional Outbursts
The trial has been marked by conflicting accounts of the working relationship between De Niro and Robinson. While Robinson portrays De Niro as demanding and abusive, De Niro maintains that he treated her with professional courtesy. The courtroom drama intensified when De Niro, in a moment of apparent frustration, shouted, “Shame on you, Chase Robinson!” at his former assistant before quickly apologizing for the outburst. This emotional display underscores the high stakes of the case for both parties.
Allegations of Gender Discrimination and Retaliation
Robinson’s lawsuit alleges gender discrimination and retaliation, claiming that De Niro created a hostile work environment and treated her differently based on her gender. She described her duties as demanding, requiring around-the-clock availability, including managing De Niro’s complex personal life. She further alleged that De Niro used sexist language towards female employees and discriminated in their compensation.
Actor Robert De Niro arrives at court in New York.Robert De Niro arriving at court for the proceedings.
Cross-Examination Challenges Robinson’s Claims
During cross-examination, De Niro’s lawyer challenged Robinson’s claims of gender discrimination, pointing out that De Niro’s highest-paid employee was a woman. The lawyer also highlighted that a male employee at Canal Productions, De Niro’s company where Robinson also worked, earned significantly less than Robinson’s $300,000 salary. This line of questioning aimed to undermine Robinson’s allegations of gender-based pay disparity.
Allegations of Angry Outbursts and Verbal Abuse
Robinson testified about several instances of alleged verbal abuse by De Niro, often involving profanity. She recounted one incident around Christmas 2017 where she claimed an intoxicated De Niro angrily called her, cursing and screaming because he couldn’t find some presents. Robinson described the incident as “incredibly hurtful,” emphasizing the emotional toll of the alleged verbal abuse. These allegations paint a picture of a volatile work environment and raise questions about the nature of the actor’s interactions with his staff.
Conclusion: Awaiting the Jury’s Verdict
The trial continues, with the jury ultimately tasked with deciding the merits of the competing claims. This case highlights the complexities of workplace relationships, particularly in high-pressure environments involving high-profile individuals. The jury’s verdict will have significant implications for both De Niro and Robinson, potentially impacting their careers and reputations. The case also serves as a reminder of the importance of fostering respectful and professional workplaces, free from harassment and discrimination.
