Amanda Chapin, a 51-year-old Wisconsin woman, has been sentenced to six years for attempting to poison her veterinarian husband with barbiturates and animal euthanasia drugs. The sentence, handed down by Circuit Court Judge Barbara McCrory, includes three years in custody and three years of supervised probation. This concludes a case that began in 2022 and involved multiple attempts to poison Dr. Gary Chapin, Amanda’s husband.
The sentencing followed Chapin’s no-contest plea in June to first-degree recklessly endangering safety, a charge amended from the initial attempted first-degree intentional homicide. While a no-contest plea does not admit guilt, it carries the same weight as a guilty plea during sentencing. The prosecution, led by Lafayette County Assistant District Attorney Corinne Fruitger, had sought the maximum sentence of 10 years, split equally between confinement and extended supervision.
Fruitger argued for the maximum penalty, emphasizing Chapin’s “utter disregard for human life.” She also highlighted the defendant’s lack of remorse and accountability, stating, “The defendant is guilty. She entered that no contest plea. She agreed to the facts stated in the criminal complaint. She agreed that they are substantially accurate.”
Chapin’s defense attorney, Morgan Johanning, requested probation or minimal incarceration, citing Chapin’s prior good deeds and healthcare career as evidence of her positive contributions to the community.
The Poisoning Plot Unfolds
According to prosecutors, the poisoning attempts occurred between July and August 2022. Amanda Chapin laced her husband’s coffee with the same barbiturates he used for animal euthanasia on three separate occasions.
The events leading up to the poisoning reveal a calculated scheme. After their March 2022 wedding, Amanda forged the signature of one of Gary’s adult children on a power-of-attorney document. She also pressured Gary, 71, to modify the deed to his house, ensuring she would inherit the property upon his death. Disturbingly, the first poisoning attempt occurred less than three weeks after the quit claim deed was authorized.
The third and final poisoning in August 2022 left Gary in a coma for four days. Blood tests revealed the presence of barbiturates, specifically the type used by veterinarians for animal euthanasia, confirming the source of the poisoning.
Sentencing and Aftermath
Prior to sentencing, Chapin addressed the court, expressing gratitude to God, her siblings, and members of her church for their support. However, this did not sway Judge McCrory, who ultimately imposed the six-year sentence. Following the sentencing, Chapin’s bond was revoked, and she was remanded to the custody of the Department of Corrections.
Legal Ramifications and Analysis
This case highlights the serious legal consequences of recklessly endangering safety, even within a domestic context. The use of controlled substances, especially those intended for animal euthanasia, to harm another individual is a grave offense. The sentence reflects the severity of the crime and the potential harm inflicted upon the victim.
The change in charges, from attempted first-degree intentional homicide to first-degree recklessly endangering safety, likely reflects the challenges in proving intent beyond a reasonable doubt. While the actions clearly endangered Gary Chapin’s life, the prosecution may have faced difficulties establishing premeditation and intent to kill.
Conclusion: A Case of Betrayal and Recklessness
The case of Amanda Chapin serves as a stark reminder of the potential for darkness even within the closest relationships. Her actions, driven by apparent greed and disregard for her husband’s life, led to a criminal conviction and a significant prison sentence. The case underscores the importance of thorough investigation and prosecution of crimes involving domestic violence and the misuse of controlled substances. The outcome provides a measure of justice for Gary Chapin and sends a strong message about the legal repercussions of such reckless endangerment.
While the legal proceedings have concluded, the emotional and psychological impact on the victim and his family will likely endure. This case serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities of human relationships and the devastating consequences that can arise from betrayal and reckless behavior.
