Justin Herbert, the Los Angeles Chargers’ star quarterback, has faced persistent challenges despite impressive individual performances. Analyst Craig Carton recently ignited debate by suggesting Herbert might be the root of the Chargers’ struggles, citing the high turnover of head coaches in Herbert’s career. Is there merit to this claim, or is Herbert unfairly burdened with the team’s shortcomings?
Herbert’s History of Coaching Changes: A Statistical Anomaly
Carton highlights the unusual frequency of coaching changes throughout Herbert’s football journey. From Mark Helfrich and Willie Taggart at Oregon to Anthony Lynn and Brandon Staley with the Chargers, Herbert has played under six head coaches in a relatively short time. This starkly contrasts with the stability experienced by quarterbacks like Joe Burrow, Tua Tagovailoa, and Jalen Hurts, who collectively have endured the same number of coaching changes despite significantly more starts. Carton argues that this pattern raises questions about Herbert’s potential role in the instability.
Examining the Evidence: Beyond the Coaching Carousel
While the frequency of coaching changes is undeniable, attributing blame solely to Herbert overlooks critical context. The Chargers’ struggles extend beyond coaching, encompassing defensive collapses and inconsistent team performance. Notably, the team squandered multiple late-game leads orchestrated by Herbert in the 2023 season, a recurring pattern throughout his career. These instances suggest broader team deficiencies rather than a singular quarterback issue.
The Counterargument: Herbert’s On-Field Excellence and Leadership
Herbert’s on-field performance consistently demonstrates elite quarterback skills. His statistical production and leadership qualities contradict the narrative of him being a problem. He consistently puts the team in positions to win, often carrying the offense on his shoulders. Blaming Herbert for defensive breakdowns or coaching decisions seems misplaced, considering his dedication and individual brilliance.
The Impact of Coaching Instability on a Quarterback’s Development
Frequent coaching changes undoubtedly impact a quarterback’s development and consistency. Each new coach brings different offensive schemes, philosophies, and expectations, requiring constant adaptation from the quarterback. This constant adjustment can hinder a quarterback’s progress and create instability within the team. However, it’s crucial to differentiate between being affected by coaching instability and being the cause of it.
Conclusion: A Nuanced Perspective on Herbert’s Role
While Carton’s observation about the high turnover of coaches in Herbert’s career is valid, concluding that Herbert is the problem oversimplifies a complex situation. The Chargers’ issues are multifaceted, stemming from coaching decisions, defensive vulnerabilities, and overall team inconsistencies. Herbert, despite facing constant change and shouldering immense responsibility, has consistently performed at a high level. The question isn’t whether Herbert is the problem but rather how the Chargers can build a more stable and supportive environment to maximize his exceptional talent. Can new head coach Jim Harbaugh provide the stability and leadership needed to unlock the Chargers’ full potential with Herbert at the helm?
